Steve and Bill @ D5: All Things Digital To create a new standard, it takes something that’s not just a little bit different, it takes something that’s really new and really captures people’s imagination, and the Macintosh, of all the machines I’ve ever seen, is the only one that meets that standard.” - Microsoft founder Bill Gates, 1984 If I were running Apple, I would milk the Macintosh for all it’s worth–and get busy on the next great thing. The PC wars are over. Done. Microsoft won a long time ago.” –Steve Jobs, 1996. The great Silicon Valley soap opera has come full circle. Not since Apple CEO Steve Jobs famously interviewed Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates as a possible suitor during the “Macintosh Dating Game” back in 1984 have the two men appeared in a joint bill. And at D5, the two shared a stage tonight for the first time in more than 20 years for what promises to be a historic discussion. # 7:15 p.m PDT: Tonight’s conversation is prefaced by a short film of previous Gates/Jobs appearances. First up: The “Macintosh Dating Game,” circa 1984. (Ah, they looked so much younger then…) And finally Gates and Jobs joking together at D in 2005. # 7:20 p.m.: Gates and Jobs onstage. # Walt recognizes the other two bachelors from the “Macintosh Dating Game”: Mitch Kapor and Fred Gibbons, who are both in the audience. # What have each of you contributed to the computer industry? Jobs: Bill built the first software company in the industry, and that was huge. And I think he built the first software company before anybody in our industry knew what a software company was. Bill was really focused on software. # Gates: First, I’d like to clarify, I am not Fake Steve Jobs.

># 7:30 p.m.: Gates continues: What Steve’s done is quite phenomenal. He has incredible taste and elegance. His ability to always come around and figure out where that next bet should be has been phenomenal. Apple really pursued the dream of building products that we want to use ourselves. He always seems to figure out where the next industry movement will be. The industry has benefited tremendously from his work. # Walt recalls the Apple II, notes that it broadened the base of who could use computers. He mentions an ad that said “thousands of people have used the Macintosh computer.” Jobs interjects: “We had some very strange ads back then.” # 7:35 p.m.: Walt: Some people don’t know that there was actually some Microsoft software in that Apple II computer. Gates begins to tell the story. Jobs interjects again: “Let me tell this story. [Steve] Wozniak develops an OS that’s fixed point and not floating point. We’re begging him to make it floating point, and he never did it. And so Microsoft had this very good floating point Basic, so we went with it.” # Gates: We really bet our future on the Macintosh being successful. So we were working together. # Jobs: Remember Microsoft wasn’t in the applications business, so this was really a big bet for them. # Gates: What was the next entry point in the industry? We’d made the bet that it would be graphics, and we went with the Mac. The original Mac OS was 14K. # Jobs: It was bigger than that–20K # Jobs: Apple did the Mac itself, but we got Bill and his team to write the applications. # 7:40 p.m. Kara: Bill, what did you think would happen after the disasters at Apple and Steve left? # Gates: We worried that Apple wasn’t differentiating itself from the other platforms–Windows and DOS. After the 512K Mac debuted, the product line just didn’t evolve the way it needed to. Certainly not the way it would have if Steve had been there. I was calling Gil Amelio on weekends and trying to get things moving. And then one day, Steve called me and said, ‘Don’t worry about those Amelio negotiations anymore.’ # Walt notes Jobs’s statement in the 1997 video about competition with Microsoft being destructive. #Jobs responds: If the game was a zero-sum game where if Apple wanted to win, Microsoft had to lose, then Apple was going to lose. But Apple didn’t have to beat Microsoft. It had to remember what Apple was. Microsoft was the biggest software developer around, and Apple was weak. So I called Bill up. # 7:45 p.m.: Jobs: The developer relationship between Microsoft and Apple is one of the best we have. (Ah, the obligatory “I’m a Mac, and I’m a PC” reference.) # Jobs:The art of those commercials is not to be mean, but for the guys to like each other. The PC Guy is great. … The PC Guy is what makes it all work. # Gates: PC guy’s mother loves him.

# How does Apple view Microsoft?
Jobs recycles his “Apple is about beautiful software in a beautiful box” comments from his earlier session today. Notes that Apple is fundamentally a software company, as is Microsoft.

# 7:50 p.m.: Jobs: Alan Kay once said, “People that love software want to build their own hardware.” … Outside of Windows on PCs, it’s hard to see other examples of software and hardware being decoupled and working well together.

# Walt to Jobs: Was there something you might have done differently where you could have had a bigger market share for the Mac. Is there something you regret?

# Jobs: There are a lot of things I could have done better the first time. You’ve got to let go of that stuff. One of the first things I did when I came back to Apple was give the Apple museum to Stanford. We need to go invent tomorrow, not worry about yesterday.”

# 7:55 p.m.: Kara: How do you view the technology landscape right now?

# Jobs: I think there is some really exciting next-generation stuff being built right now.

# Gates: It’s an exciting period. We’ll look back on these years as one of the great periods of invention.

# Walt: You’re the guys that represent the rich client, the big operating system, but there’s the notion these days that all that is migrating to the cloud. In five years, will the PC still be the linchpin of all this stuff?

# Gates: Remember the single-function computer? Larry Ellison’s network computer? As you look at the device that’s connecting to the TV set of the car, but when you come to the full screen … in a living room … we’re nowhere near leaving that.

# 8 p.m.: Jobs: Here’s an example. The Google Maps app we wrote for the iPhone is way better than Google Maps itself. Why? Because you’re running the app locally. You can do so much more with a rich client than you can with a browser. At the same time, rich clients are improving and their cost is declining. The marriage of these services with a powerful client is a very powerful marriage.

# 8:05 p.m.: What are the devices you might carry around five years from now?

# Gates: I think you’ll have a number of devices. A tablet and then another smaller one that you can carry around in your pocket. Those are natural form factors.

# Jobs: The PC has been very resilient. Its death has been predicted many times. But the Internet came around and invigorated it. And then it plateaued again. And then digital media came around and invigorated it again. And so I think the PC is going to continue to be with us. But then there’s an explosion in post-PC devices. There’s a category of devices that aren’t general purpose. They’re more focused and that category is going to continue to be very innovative.

# What are the core applications of these portable devices?

# Gates says we’ll have a broad range of choice, but one that will be limited by their size. He notes that you still can’t reasonably edit your homework on a cellphone screen.

# Jobs says he doesn’t know what will be on these devices. Why? “Because five years ago, I never thought there would be maps on them. But now there are.”

# 8:10 p.m. What areas of the Internet do you find exciting?
[long pause … really long pause, then:]
# Jobs: There are a zillion interesting things going on on the Internet. A lot surrounding entertainment, but a lot about figuring out how to navigate life more efficiently.

# 8:15 p.m.: Jobs on entertainment: People want to enjoy entertainment when they want it, how they want it, on the device they want it on. And if you’re a content company, that’s a great thing. But the transitions are hard sometimes.

# 8:20 p.m.: Walt asks about the future of the OS and the user interface. Will we see a new paradigm?
Gates posits that we’re near to seeing some big advances in 3D and multitouch. 3D positional devices. Software can be vision, and that can be done inexpensively and pervasively.

# 8:30 p.m.: What’s the greatest misunderstanding in your relationship?

# Jobs (deadpans): We’ve kept our marriage secret for over a decade now. [Rimshot!]

# Slience from Gates, then: Uhh… I don’t think either of us has anything to complain about, in general. … I miss some people who’ve left the industry. It’s nice to have someone like Steve around.

# Jobs: When Bill and I first entered the industry, we were the youngest guys in the room, and now we’re the oldest. I think of most things in life as either a Dylan or Beatles song. And there’s that one line in that Beatles song, “You and I have memories longer than the road that stretches out ahead,” and I think that applies here.”
[That may come across as cheesy here in print, but honestly it wasn’t. When we post the video, you’ll likely find it pretty touching.]

# And after that tender moment, we’re on to the Q&A …

# Q.: At what point is there too much diversity in tech? Our lives are often made better by standards, but it seems diversity is near to reaching a point where the convergence we’d like is no longer possible.

# Jobs: I think Bill and I would agree we could get it down to two … It’s hard to limit imagination.

# Gates: I think the market is very good at limiting …

# 8:35 p.m.: Q.: What about your legacies? If you had to choose one, what would it be? Steve Jobs, do you envy Bill Gates’s second act?
# Gates: The most important work I’ve had a chance to be involved in has been with the PC. That’s my life’s work. I’m lucky that I’ve been able to apply the skills and resources I developed through those experience in other areas.

# 8:40 p.m.: Q.: Advice for the upcoming entrpreneur?
# Gates: The idea of being at the forefront and increasing in size has been one of our greatest challenges. Our business is really about the passion.

# Jobs: If you don’t love it, you’re going to fail. You’ve got to love it and you’ve got to have passion. And you’ve got to be a great talent scout, you can only build a great organization around great people.

# Q: What do you wish you’d learned from each other early on?

# Gates: I admire Steve’s taste. And that’s not a joke.

# Jobs: If Apple could have had a bit of Microsoft’s knack for partnerships early on, we would have been better for it.

# 8:45 p.m.: A lot of the innovation around the Internet that we see today seems to be youth oriented. What about older generations?
Jobs notes that iSight and iChat are widely used among grandparents, etc.
Another example from Jobs: We began offering personal training sessions at our retail stores a year ago, and we’ve done nearly a million. Many of them are with seniors.

# What sorts of new communication technologies do you see coming down the pipe in the next years?
# Gates: Well, I don’t think Steve’s going to announce his personal transporter tonight. …
# Jobs: I don’t know. And that’s what makes it exciting to go into work every day. I can’t even begin to think of what it will be like in 10 years.

Standing ovation. Well deserved. Well deserved.

Google has only just bought YouTube but already Microsoft is fighting back by striking a deal on Monday with video search engine Blinkx.

About Blinkx

Blinkx is an innovative video search engine that could potentially stem out to be the leader in video search technology.

Like all the emerging video search engines, Blinkx's video index includes sites ranging from YouTube, BBC News, Sky News, Fox and many other sites. The company already boasts six million hours of audio, video and TV programming in its index.

Unlike competing video search technology Blinkx uses speech recognition to discover what the video is about. It still uses textual information like its competitors but combines this with speech recognition which, it beleives sets it above the competition.

I'm not entirely convinced that speech recognition technology is advanced enough to be very useful just yet. I personally think the answer lies in using a community to assist rankings in search results.

Blinkx and Microsoft

Unlike the Google-YouTube deal this is not a takeover but a deal where Blinkx will license its search technology to Microsoft.

Blinkx will be used to power video search on some parts of MSN and Live.com bringing video search capabilities to the existing website search.

The deal would see Blinkx getting paid a license fee dependant on how many people use the "MicroBlinkx" video search. "It could mean from zero to millions of dollars," says Chandratillake, the Blinx co founder (nothing quite like being vague).

Unfortunately for Microsoft this is not an exclusive deal and Blinkx is already working with other companies and may end up working with more.

Blinkx and Lycos

Blinkx signed a deal in August to power the video search of Lycos. Lycos hopes to reinvent itself as a broadband entertainment destination.

This deal is very similar to Microsoft so already they have themselves competition using the exact same technology. I'm sure though that Lycos are more worried about who will come out on top than Microsoft.

Blinkx and AOL

According to another News report Blinkx is used to power AOL video. But I think this is a mix up.

Blinkx technology is used by AOL StudyBuddy to index educational content from selected sites. But when it comes to video search AOL already has its own ideas.
AOL previously acquired video search startup Truveo and is already putting it to good use. It already looks and feels far better than Blinkx.

Blinkx needs help

Take a look through the Blinkx site and you will see they don't have a clue about user friendliness.

Blinkx has an idea of multiple small TV screens showing short video teaser clips to help you choose what to watch, but this just hurts my head. It looks cool for a second but you can't stare at it for too long, nevermind pick a video.

The search results pages are a little better but it still feels a little over crowded and there is too much going on.

Blinkx needs a company like Microsoft to use the technology to its full potential. Hopefully Microsoft can clean this up to make its own user friendly video search using the Blinkx technology.

Threat to YouTube

Its no surprise that this deal is coming through just as Google acquires YouTube and I'm sure Microsoft sees Google's growing dominance as a threat.

I recently discussed the threat of video search to YouTube as it will greatly open up the video sharing market, potentially causing YouTube to lose its market share.

With Microsoft pushing video search this could now happen more quickly than first anticipated. While Google and YouTube present a limited selection of videos hosted on their own sites, Microsoft will offer video clips from nearly everywhere.

It is also good to note that a video search engine, since it hosts no video, is a much better choice from a copyright lawsuit perspective. Microsoft can sit back and watch YouTube and Google get "sued to oblivion" while people still use MSN and Live.com to search for video.

Who's made the better move? Google or Microsoft? We shall wait and watch…